Hank Rearden and Francisco d’Anconia Comparison (Priya Dhairyawan)

                Hank and Francisco demonstrate both similarities and differences with regards to their philosophies about work and money. Hank is willing to do whatever it takes to make his business successful. He also thinks that he is in no way obligated to provide metal for those who think lowly of him. Rearden would rather have the State Science Institute steal from him than have to approve their order. He does not want to help the looters, and I think this says a significant amount about his character. Rearden believes in himself and his ideas, and will not conform to society’s expectations. He is willing to disregard the law in order to stay true to his beliefs. Hank even admits that he does not accept the court’s control of his metal. He is aware of the fact that many individuals need his approval, but does nothing to please them if it means swaying from his true character.

                Francisco shows that his regard for money is held extremely high. He believes that money does not create problems, but rather that it is the stem of goodness. Francisco cannot see the negative consequences that money can create; he only sees the benefits. D’Anconia thinks that money measures the amount of productivity and success in the world, so there is no reason to think that it causes problems. Francisco is able to offer advice to Hank, claiming that one of Rearden’s flaws is that he does not put himself first. He is willing to suffer for something that he should be celebrating. Francisco seems a bit tougher in the sense that he can detect wrongdoings and actively vocalize his disapproval.