The idea of being a martyr is a
theme that shows up throughout the novel Atlas
Shrugged especially through the concept of sacrifice. As described by Rand
in Galt’s speech near the end of the novel, “sacrifice does not mean the
rejection of the worthless, but of the precious” (940-941), and unfortunately
for the men and women like Dagny, Francisco, and Hank the world unknowingly
sacrificed them for ideals they believed to be good, but are in fact ideals
that in the end have destroyed them. Unbeknownst to those such as James and
Lillian, they have sacrificed themselves as well, as shown in the inevitable
fall of all of civilization.
What Rand is saying reminds me a
lot of the discussion we had the first day we started to discuss The Stranger. We were questioning
whether selflessness existed and I believe want Rand is saying is that it does
not. One of the hardest examples that we had to discuss in class was the sacrifice
made by the firefighters who ran into the World Trade Center the day of 9/11. Rand
has stated is that sacrifice is selfish, but I think that in order to
understand what Rant is saying, we’re going to have to remove connotation
associated with both of the worlds. We’ve gotten used to hearing the word
sacrifice and thinking of honor and morals, and yet we’ve used the idea of a
martyr has a calling to war. During the Afghan Iraq War, the Iranian government
in order to raise troops handed out plastic keys preaching to boys as young as
thirteen that if they went and fought and died for Iran this would be their key
to heaven, and so millions of boy sacrificed themselves for a cause that they
didn’t even understand. And of course this is incredibly tragic, but I find it
disgusting that this idea of sacrifice could so easily manipulate people into
giving up their lives. I feel that the idea of sacrifice has more often then
not been used as an excuse, whether it has been the boys in the Afghan Iraq War
or those we lost in the War in Afghanistan. So now when we look back to firefighters
who lost their lives in the World Trade Center we cant just say that what they did
was sacrifice. It is true that the firefighters who died that day gave up the time
they could have spent living out the rest of their lives with their loved ones,
but they gave up that time for what they believed to be a greater cause. This
was their choice and they made it, and there is little that is more honorable,
but according to Rand this was not a sacrifice. They believed that possibly
saving the life of another was a greater cause; their sacrifice would have been
to run in the other direction of the towers. Their bravery will always be
remembered, but their choice should not be used for the benefit of politicians
who cry out that we have to fight for their sacrifice, and I believe this is
the same message that Rand was trying to send. That James Taggart and the others
like him took advantage of this idea of sacrifice and used it to manipulate the
people into believing that the sacrifices they were being forced to make was
for the “good of the people”.
If I read this correctly, I believe that in your post you are trying to convey to the class the idea that the concept of sacrifice is often overblown. As long as this is your point, I would like to tell you that I completely agree with you. It is often difficult to say that sacrifice is wrong because of how much martyrs are usually praised. However, there are people who take advantage of sacrifice and what comes with it. For instance, as you implied, many politicians try to get to their voters by using different means of sacrifice. In the end, these are all usually liars. Anyways, do not get me wrong, as you also said, there are many people who are rightfully praised for their sacrifices such as firefighters, soldiers, etc.. To conclude, I really enjoyed reading and understanding your post and for the most part I found common ground with you.
ReplyDelete