Even
during current times, decades after the novel was published, as we read Atlas Shrugged it’s hard not to notice
how many social problems the novel points out and when we think back to when
the novel was first published its amazing to realize how radical the novel was
for its time. For example when this book was first published in 1957, the
readers probably conceptualized Dagny's role and choices in the world
differently then how we do today. The standards held for women have changed
drastically. It's no longer shocking to see a female CEO, and currently the front
runner for FED chairman is a woman. Even when discussing Atlas Shrugged outside the classroom I hear people claiming that
they wish they were Dagny Taggart. But when we look back on Dagny's romantic
past we see that she was probably not accepted by most women in the 1950's.
She's had sex before she was married, and continued to for years, and then in
her next relationship she become involved with a married man, and while still involved
with him she fell for another. And I understand that this is what Rand was
trying to go for, that she was trying to shock people, but she has spent that
whole book preaching about practicality, and I don't see how that's practical. There’s
a reason why we don’t see CEO’s bluntly talking about status or decisions of
their company, and instead covering them up. It’s not very ethical, but it’s
necessary for the business in order to make money.
Rand
makes it very easy, and again I believe for shock value, for the reader to hate
James Taggart and Lillian Rearden. Both are driven by the same goal of pushing
others down in order to make themselves feel tall, and are in fact very similar
characters, only their gender placing them in different aspects of society. But
what makes it hard for me to call them evil, especially James, is that they are
in fact very sad characters. They are driven by the same jealousy that drives
little kids to stealing other’s toys. They see Hank’s, Francisco’s, and Dagny’s
natural affinity toward being brilliant and successful, and I find natural and
human of them to be jealous of this. But unfortunately for the entire world,
they grew up in a time when they were not taught by their parents or their
teachers or anyone superior how to move past the jealousy, but were in fact
only encouraged. James and Lillian are still just children in a grown up
world, holding positions of leadership that they should not have.
Wow! I was completely unaware of the time period this was written in. That actually made me like the book a little bit more (which is hard in the times of the 3rd part). It is fascinating that Ayn Rand developed Dagny into that time with all of the qualities that she has. It makes her a more interesting character and brings me a new perspective.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with everything that Gioia has said. What I found especially interesting about Gioia's post was her comment on how impractical Dagny's love is. Before reading this post I was already annoyed with Dagny's flighty attitude towards love. Gioia has made me realize that my hatred of Dagny's romantic life comes from the irrationality of it. In every other aspect of her life Dagny is depicted as being completely rational, however when it comes to her love life, she changes her mind on a whim, going from Francisco to Rearden to Galt. She falls in lust quickly and calls it love, and in the process is not as respectable as she could be.
ReplyDelete